MODES OF APPREHENSION, POSSIBILITIES OF JUSTICE: SRI LANKA’S JULY 1983, AND MAY, 2009
This paper is under girded by a comparison of two profound punctuation points in the modern history of Sri Lanka: July, 1983 and May 2009. It can be argued that these two moments of “violence”– the first an attack on Tamil civilians in urban centers, the second a military offensive, which led to Tamil civilian casualties, mark the beginning and the end, of a long civil war.
While Governmental Commission of Inquiry in the style of a truth commission, has reported on, and recommended reparations in the case of the first, this is hardly known, a better known modes of apprehension of 1983 continues to be anthropological – (Kapferer) and aesthetic (Chandragupta Thenuwara). Turning to May, 2009 we find that while one of the dominant modes of apprehension of the event is visual (BBC Channel Four films) here the aesthetisization of horror has led wide spread calls for an International Inquiry, thematized around “war crimes,” and the discounting of the LLRC and even the UN SG’s panel report (Dharusman Commission).
This paper seeks to elaborate comparison between modes of apprehension and possibility of justice, given the aftermath of these two events. One the one hand, cultural/aesthetic modes of apprehension will be compared, and on the other hand legal modalities of inquiry, commissions past and proposed will be compared. It is my suggestion that this comparison yields a nuanced account of the limits and possibilities of justice in the aftermath of prolonged violence.